The case against meat

I am still fighting it out with my fellow green builders on a list serv. I still eat meat, although a lot less, and am still not sure if my body is made to not eat meat…..but…here is what I wrote:

After cooling off a bit I am ready to come back in. I have a lot to say about this issue and apparently my opinions are in the minority on this list. Obviously local organic meat is better than overseas contaminated vegetables. But that is what I call a denial comparison because it is a way to justify something that is not sustainable. It is like saying that a new green building is fine because it is better than a badly renovated old building.

As long as we have the huge quantity of good old buildings, I do not think new buildings are sustainable, no matter how green they are. Obviously there are exceptions where some bad old buildings are better off demolished. But I am talking from a big picture point of view. The situation from the big picture in my eyes should always start with, “Can we avoid building new and renovate instead.” Then go from there.
Likewise for eating meat. The numbers I have seen are that our current world population can not sustain the amount of meat we consume. Period. The argument that it is part of our genes and we’ve been doing it forever is weak. Anyone for a smoke? We’ve been doing that since the beginning of fire too. Yet it does not seem to be part of our genes. And genes evolve anyway. History is not a great indicator of what is correct. Times have changed. Never have we had so many mouths to feed.

“We are made wise not by the recollection of our past, but by the responsibility of our future” GB Shaw.

So my original point when we started this discussion, a point I felt was misrepresented by others, is that the ideal situation is to drastically reduce our consumption of meat, if not eradicate it altogether. Just like I think we should drastically reduce our new construction, if not eradicate it altogether.

Of course there are exceptions where some will eat more meat than others based on needs and geography. But our current consumption of meat is not at all sustainable. Organic and local is a good start and maybe all we need. But I am not convinced we can stop there. How are we going to feed a city like NY or New Delhi with organic grass fed local beef. Come on, be realistic.

We are at a new era and I think meat is more part of history than it is our future.

And it is not about simple physical survival. Clearly that goes hand in hand with our spiritual survival.

Our evolving awareness of animal emotions and needs shows that it is cruel to keep and kill animals beyond the most local sustainable means, and even that practice I think will fade.

The way we view and treat animals remains barbaric. The vast majority of the population still sees animals as unfeeling stupid creatures, which in my opinion is a mirror of the humans.

It is not possible for me as a green builder to not take into consideration the statistics (which resoundingly show current meat production is destroying the planet) but also the moral and spiritual aspect of killing animals.

This is not to say that plants do not scream when we cut them. Studies show that they do. All living creatures feel and experience the world way beyond what we think they do. We are so out of touch with our surroundings in this area.

I read a great quote the other day: What will it take for humans to become indigenous again?

We are this arrogant plague on the earth right now, barreling down a path to self extinction. I personally don’t want my ancestors to be cockroaches.

We need to drastically rethink how we do things. Green builders need to be leaders in this field for the very reason that we are responsible for changing one of, if not THE MOST destructive forces on the planet: human development. If green builders don’t change this then I don’t see who will.

And I don’t mean building a LEED platinum building. That is a joke. It is like smoking more efficiently. I mean really, drastically rethinking how we build, why we build and if we need to build at all.

And the consumption of meat, the production of meat, and the distribution of meat is deeply connected to this. I realize most people don’t see a connection but I do. I don’t think one can be solved without the other. They both involve the same change of viewpoint.

Similar Posts:

Posted in All Posts, Ethics, Green Tagged with:
One comment on “The case against meat
  1. How much of the worlds edible crops are used to produce alcohol?
    It takes kilo of potatoes to make a litre of vodka. Plus all the water. packaging, transport. Let alone all the health problems alcohol causes. Road deaths. Sex assaults and rapes.
    Just like smoking tobacco. Ethical living involves not drinking alcohol or smoking. Do you know any one like this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Categories

Subscribe